Americans have long understood that their birthplace can significantly affect their futures, and academics have increasingly been able to connect tangible early life factors like where they live and the friendships they’ve cultivated with potential future income.
Among the most recent studies shedding light on what’s known as economic mobility—a person’s ability to move themselves and their families up the socioeconomic ladder over their lifetime—are a series of papers authored by Harvard University researchers leveraging vast troves of social networking data.
As part of a national analysis, Wealth Enhancement Group used data from Harvard University‘s Social Capital Atlas project to identify where in Georgia children have the best (and worst) chances at upward economic mobility.
The research draws on a privacy-protected dataset representing 21 billion friendships from Facebook made public through its parent company Meta’s Data for Good project. It also uses anonymous tax records, according to the authors. The scholars assigned a score to locales according to how economically connected low- and high-income people living in the area have historically been over at least a decade, per that data. The dataset does not include scores for about 180 of the 3,000 or so counties in the U.S.
TOO MANY ADS? GO AD-FREE
Did You Know?: The ads you see on this site help pay for our website and our work. However, we know some of our readers would rather pay and not see ads. For those users we offer a paid newsletter that contains our articles with no ads.
What You Get: A daily email digest of our articles in full-text with no ads.
The research attempts to fill in the gaps of previous efforts to study American economic mobility that did not consider a person’s vast social networks nor their importance in creating better lives for themselves and their children.
It turns out the ability to cultivate friendships linking people of different socioeconomic backgrounds with one another is the strongest factor in determining whether a child can surpass the earning potential of their parents, Harvard researchers found. They call this economic connectedness.
Read on to find out where economic connectedness is strongest in your state.
Canva
#50. Heard County
– Economic connectedness: 0.66
– Median Income: $55,635
– Population: 11,440
— 86.2% white
— 9.9% Black
— 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.8% Asian
Canva
#49. Rockdale County
– Economic connectedness: 0.66
– Median Income: $64,230
– Population: 92,983
— 33.5% white
— 56.3% Black
— 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 1.9% Asian
Canva
#48. Chatham County
– Economic connectedness: 0.66
– Median Income: $61,064
– Population: 294,815
— 50.6% white
— 40.4% Black
— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 2.8% Asian
chase s wingo // Shutterstock
#47. Walker County
– Economic connectedness: 0.67
– Median Income: $48,633
– Population: 67,772
— 91.4% white
— 4% Black
— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.8% Asian
Canva
#46. Jasper County
– Economic connectedness: 0.67
– Median Income: $52,322
– Population: 14,478
— 76% white
— 18.4% Black
— 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.2% Asian
Canva
#45. DeKalb County
– Economic connectedness: 0.67
– Median Income: $69,423
– Population: 758,634
— 32.6% white
— 52.8% Black
— 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 6.1% Asian
Canva
#44. Bulloch County
– Economic connectedness: 0.68
– Median Income: $50,583
– Population: 79,635
— 64% white
— 27.9% Black
— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 1.5% Asian
Canva
#43. Lincoln County
– Economic connectedness: 0.68
– Median Income: $44,087
– Population: 7,686
— 67.7% white
— 29% Black
— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.1% Asian
Canva
#42. Habersham County
– Economic connectedness: 0.68
– Median Income: $56,680
– Population: 45,767
— 83.5% white
— 3.3% Black
— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 2% Asian
Wirestock Creators // Shutterstock
#41. Glascock County
– Economic connectedness: 0.68
– Median Income: $53,125
– Population: 2,903
— 88.7% white
— 10.2% Black
— 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0% Asian
Canva
#40. Henry County
– Economic connectedness: 0.69
– Median Income: $73,491
– Population: 236,615
— 43% white
— 46.7% Black
— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 3.3% Asian
Georges_Creations // Shutterstock
#39. Butts County
– Economic connectedness: 0.69
– Median Income: $53,613
– Population: 24,950
— 67% white
— 28.1% Black
— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.3% Asian
Harris Aerial Solutions // Shutterstock
#38. Haralson County
– Economic connectedness: 0.7
– Median Income: $57,752
– Population: 29,685
— 91.2% white
— 4.8% Black
— 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.3% Asian
Canva
#37. Rabun County
– Economic connectedness: 0.7
– Median Income: $48,652
– Population: 16,731
— 90.9% white
— 1.4% Black
— 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.6% Asian
JNix // Shutterstock
#36. Carroll County
– Economic connectedness: 0.7
– Median Income: $62,498
– Population: 118,402
— 71.9% white
— 20% Black
— 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.8% Asian
Marcus E Jones // Shutterstock
#35. Douglas County
– Economic connectedness: 0.71
– Median Income: $67,731
– Population: 143,520
— 42.6% white
— 48.3% Black
— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 1.8% Asian
William Silver // Shutterstock
#34. Liberty County
– Economic connectedness: 0.71
– Median Income: $50,617
– Population: 64,334
— 42.2% white
— 41.4% Black
— 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 1.9% Asian
JNix // Shutterstock
#33. Dade County
– Economic connectedness: 0.71
– Median Income: $47,675
– Population: 16,313
— 94.2% white
— 1.1% Black
— 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.7% Asian
Canva
#32. Fannin County
– Economic connectedness: 0.71
– Median Income: $49,810
– Population: 25,198
— 94.2% white
— 0.3% Black
— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.5% Asian
Canva
#31. Jones County
– Economic connectedness: 0.72
– Median Income: $61,701
– Population: 28,297
— 72% white
— 24.4% Black
— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.6% Asian
Canva
#30. Banks County
– Economic connectedness: 0.73
– Median Income: $57,893
– Population: 18,061
— 89.5% white
— 2.6% Black
— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 1.3% Asian
Canva
#29. Bartow County
– Economic connectedness: 0.73
– Median Income: $65,559
– Population: 107,868
— 80.6% white
— 10.3% Black
— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 1% Asian
Canva
#28. Union County
– Economic connectedness: 0.73
– Median Income: $52,509
– Population: 24,183
— 94.5% white
— 0.8% Black
— 1.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.3% Asian
Canva
#27. Pike County
– Economic connectedness: 0.74
– Median Income: $76,152
– Population: 18,754
— 87.8% white
— 8.6% Black
— 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.4% Asian
Canva
#26. Long County
– Economic connectedness: 0.74
– Median Income: $52,742
– Population: 16,398
— 59.7% white
— 23.2% Black
— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.9% Asian
Canva
#25. Clarke County
– Economic connectedness: 0.75
– Median Income: $44,070
– Population: 128,195
— 60.6% white
— 27.8% Black
— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 3.9% Asian
Canva
#24. Towns County
– Economic connectedness: 0.75
– Median Income: $53,084
– Population: 12,300
— 94.3% white
— 2.3% Black
— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.4% Asian
Canva
#23. Gwinnett County
– Economic connectedness: 0.77
– Median Income: $75,853
– Population: 948,505
— 42.6% white
— 28.3% Black
— 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 12.3% Asian
Canva
#22. Walton County
– Economic connectedness: 0.77
– Median Income: $71,692
– Population: 95,453
— 75.7% white
— 18.4% Black
— 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 1.5% Asian
Paul Brennan // Shutterstock
#21. Barrow County
– Economic connectedness: 0.77
– Median Income: $68,365
– Population: 82,138
— 73.6% white
— 12.5% Black
— 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 4% Asian
Brett Barnhill // Shutterstock
#20. Fulton County
– Economic connectedness: 0.78
– Median Income: $77,635
– Population: 1,054,286
— 42.5% white
— 43.5% Black
— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 7.5% Asian
Canva
#19. Catoosa County
– Economic connectedness: 0.78
– Median Income: $62,669
– Population: 67,579
— 90.9% white
— 2.3% Black
— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 1.6% Asian
Canva
#18. Effingham County
– Economic connectedness: 0.78
– Median Income: $72,279
– Population: 63,448
— 78.6% white
— 13.6% Black
— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.7% Asian
Canva
#17. Harris County
– Economic connectedness: 0.78
– Median Income: $82,244
– Population: 34,316
— 78.1% white
— 15.7% Black
— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.6% Asian
Canva
#16. Cobb County
– Economic connectedness: 0.79
– Median Income: $86,013
– Population: 762,500
— 55% white
— 27.5% Black
— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 5.5% Asian
Canva
#15. Coweta County
– Economic connectedness: 0.8
– Median Income: $83,486
– Population: 144,928
— 74.5% white
— 17.6% Black
— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 2.1% Asian
Canva
#14. Jackson County
– Economic connectedness: 0.8
– Median Income: $73,455
– Population: 73,839
— 83.9% white
— 7.4% Black
— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 1.9% Asian
Canva
#13. White County
– Economic connectedness: 0.8
– Median Income: $64,729
– Population: 27,886
— 92% white
— 1.7% Black
— 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.6% Asian
RodClementPhotography // Shutterstock
#12. Pickens County
– Economic connectedness: 0.81
– Median Income: $71,637
– Population: 32,814
— 87.8% white
— 1.3% Black
— 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.3% Asian
Canva
#11. Camden County
– Economic connectedness: 0.81
– Median Income: $61,636
– Population: 54,256
— 71.2% white
— 18.4% Black
— 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 2.1% Asian
Canva
#10. Columbia County
– Economic connectedness: 0.84
– Median Income: $85,928
– Population: 154,274
— 71% white
— 16.9% Black
— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 4.1% Asian
Kevin Chen Images // Shutterstock
#9. Bryan County
– Economic connectedness: 0.85
– Median Income: $81,032
– Population: 43,278
— 73.6% white
— 14.2% Black
— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 1.7% Asian
Canva
#8. Lumpkin County
– Economic connectedness: 0.88
– Median Income: $64,179
– Population: 33,188
— 93.5% white
— 1.5% Black
— 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 1.5% Asian
Canva
#7. Paulding County
– Economic connectedness: 0.9
– Median Income: $80,234
– Population: 165,688
— 71.8% white
— 20.3% Black
— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 1.2% Asian
Canva
#6. Fayette County
– Economic connectedness: 0.93
– Median Income: $96,084
– Population: 117,828
— 62.9% white
— 24% Black
— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 4.7% Asian
Canva
#5. Dawson County
– Economic connectedness: 0.93
– Median Income: $77,630
– Population: 26,202
— 93.9% white
— 0.9% Black
— 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.8% Asian
SevenMaps // Shutterstock
#4. Chattahoochee County
– Economic connectedness: 0.96
– Median Income: $50,018
– Population: 9,533
— 62.9% white
— 19.5% Black
— 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 3.1% Asian
Darryl Brooks // Shutterstock
#3. Cherokee County
– Economic connectedness: 0.97
– Median Income: $90,681
– Population: 262,155
— 83% white
— 7.3% Black
— 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 1.8% Asian
Canva
#2. Oconee County
– Economic connectedness: 0.99
– Median Income: $106,165
– Population: 41,006
— 86.7% white
— 3.6% Black
— 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 3.8% Asian
Canva
#1. Forsyth County
– Economic connectedness: 1.04
– Median Income: $120,999
– Population: 245,754
— 72.6% white
— 3.8% Black
— 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 15.4% Asian
This story features data reporting and writing by Dom DiFurio and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 50 states.
This story originally appeared on Wealth Enhancement Group and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio.