In a significant decision that could set a precedent for access to public records, the Supreme Court of Georgia ruled that an open records lawsuit against Western Judicial Circuit District Attorney Deborah Gonzalez will move forward. This ruling upholds an earlier decision by a trial court, denying Gonzalez’s motion to dismiss the case.
Just the Facts: The lawsuit, filed by Athens-Clarke County resident Jarrod Miller, accuses Gonzalez of failing to comply with a request under Georgia’s Open Records Act. Miller’s request sought documents related to staff shortages, caseloads, and other concerns tied to the operations of the district attorney’s office. Gonzalez, in her defense, argued that district attorneys are constitutional officers of the judicial branch and therefore not subject to the Open Records Act.
The Supreme Court disagreed. In a unanimous decision authored by Justice John J. Ellington, the court found that district attorneys exercise executive power, making them subject to the Open Records Act. This ruling means that Gonzalez must respond to Miller’s records request, despite her claims that prosecutorial immunity should protect her from the lawsuit.
The Details:
• Miller submitted a request under the Open Records Act for records about the performance of the district attorney’s office, particularly related to claims of staff shortages and case management issues.
• Gonzalez sought to have the case dismissed, arguing that her office, as part of the judicial branch, was not bound by the Open Records Act.
• The trial court disagreed with her interpretation of the law, and Gonzalez appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court.
• On October 22, 2024, the state’s high court upheld the trial court’s decision, rejecting Gonzalez’s arguments.
In Context: This case is an example of the ongoing tension over transparency in government offices across Georgia. Open Records Act requests are crucial for journalists, activists, and citizens seeking to hold public officials accountable.
District attorneys, who handle sensitive criminal cases, often find themselves in a unique position between government transparency and legal confidentiality. This ruling clarifies that district attorneys’ offices fall under the purview of the Open Records Act, reaffirming the public’s right to access records.
The ruling comes at a time when Gonzalez has faced growing criticism over the management of her office, with some claiming that a lack of transparency exacerbates existing issues, including case backlogs and victims’ rights violations.
Looking Forward: The ruling may pave the way for similar lawsuits against other district attorneys in Georgia, challenging the level of public access to prosecutorial records.
