📰 The Gist: Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, under scrutiny for allegations of an improper relationship with a special prosecutor in the Trump case, defended her actions and the qualifications of the prosecutor during a church service on January 14, 2024.
🔍 The Details: Willis, speaking at Big Bethel AME Church in Atlanta, addressed the allegations for the first time since they were made in a court filing. Without confirming or denying a romantic involvement, she described Nathan Wade, the special prosecutor in question, as a “great friend and a great lawyer,” emphasizing his legal expertise. Willis highlighted that Wade, along with two other special prosecutors hired for the Trump election interference case, is paid the same rate, countering allegations of preferential treatment.
The Quote: “I appointed three special counselors. It’s my right to do. Paid them all the same hourly rate. They only attack one. I hired one white woman: a good personal friend and great lawyer, a superstar, I tell you. I hired one white man: brilliant, my friend, and a great lawyer. And I hired one Black man, another superstar, a great friend, and a great lawyer,” Willis said.
📖 In Context: The allegations against Willis stem from a court filing by Ashleigh Merchant, representing Michael Roman, a former Trump campaign staffer. The motion alleges an improper relationship between Willis and Wade and questions Wade’s qualifications for the case. It seeks to dismiss the indictment and disqualify Willis and Wade from the case.
TOO MANY ADS? GO AD-FREE
Did You Know?: The ads you see on this site help pay for our website and our work. However, we know some of our readers would rather pay and not see ads. For those users we offer a paid newsletter that contains our articles with no ads.
What You Get: A daily email digest of our articles in full-text with no ads.
📉 By The Numbers:
- Nathan Wade has been paid nearly $654,000 in legal fees since January 2022 for his role in the Trump election case.
- Willis and her team have a 95% conviction rate.
🔎 Why It Matters: The controversy has stirred debates over the integrity of the prosecution and raised questions about racial and gender biases in the scrutiny of public officials. Critics have used this situation to challenge Willis’ judgment and the impartiality of the case.
🔮 What’s Next?: A hearing on the motion is expected in February, as the case’s complexities and the public scrutiny of Willis’ professional and personal decisions continue to unfold.