Georgia’s senators are worried about how Trump’s Chinese Tariffs could harm the ports of Savannah and Brunswick

June 23, 2019
1 min read
Georgia's U.S. Senators Johnny Isakson and David Perdue, both republicans, are urging the Trump administration to remove ship-to-shore cranes used at Georgia’s ports of Savannah and Brunswick from its proposed fourth round of Section 301 tariffs on Chinese imports.
The Port of Savannah

Georgia’s U.S. Senators Johnny Isakson and David Perdue, both republicans, are urging the Trump administration to remove ship-to-shore cranes used at Georgia’s ports of Savannah and Brunswick from its proposed fourth round of Section 301 tariffs on Chinese imports.

In a letter sent to U.S. Trade Ambassador Robert Lighthizer, Isakson and Perdue share their support for the president’s efforts to address unfair and harmful trade practices committed by China and agree that “correcting trade imbalances and creating a level playing field for American businesses and manufacturers will ensure a thriving economy for the future.”

The senators are requesting that the administration remain consistent with its previous decisions by removing the ship-to-shore cranes used at the Port of Savannah and the Port of Brunswick from the proposed list of tariffs to “allow our ports to continue with important infrastructure upgrades and prevent major disruptions to trade in the southeastern United States.”

According to the senators, Georgia ports regularly set new records for productivity and imports and exports are projected to continue to increase in the coming years. These goods are loaded and offloaded using ship-to-shore cranes, which were originally included in list three of the Section 301 tariffs, but were removed in a previous decision by the U.S. Trade Representative.

TOO MANY ADS? GO AD-FREE
Did You Know?: The ads you see on this site help pay for our website and our work. However, we know some of our readers would rather pay and not see ads. For those users we offer a paid newsletter that contains our articles with no ads.
What You Get: A daily email digest of our articles in full-text with no ads.

“Furthermore, we ask that USTR remove all items that were initially removed from previous Section 301 tranches and then added again to list four,” the senators conclude in their letter. “Doing so will help to ensure predictability, reinforce the integrity of the exemption process, and reduce redundancy.”


Events Calendar