Hiring managers in Georgia are pushing back against the rising use of AI-generated resumes, according to a new survey. Despite AI tools becoming commonplace in resume creation, nearly half (44%) of managers in the state are rejecting resumes that show signs of being AI-crafted. While many job applicants turn to artificial intelligence for polished and detailed documents, those same qualities might be working against them in the hiring process.
The Details: The survey, commissioned by Resume.io, polled 3,000 hiring managers across Georgia. It revealed that while AI-generated resumes are often well-constructed, hiring managers prefer authenticity. According to Amanda Augustine, a career expert at Resume.io, “Employers are looking for genuine candidates, not just flawless prose.”
A notable 78% of Georgia managers said they would rather receive a poorly written but authentic resume than a polished one created with AI. The idea behind this preference is that a candidate’s authenticity is more important than the perfection offered by AI tools.
AI in Resume Writing: The survey sheds light on how employers feel about candidates using AI tools. About 31% of managers recommend customizing AI-generated resumes to reflect personal experiences and skills accurately. Another 22% suggest using AI as a basic starting point, followed by seeking professional assistance for refinement. Only a small group, 21%, support the full use of AI for creating resumes without further personalization.
The hesitation stems from the concern that AI may distort a candidate’s true qualifications. Nearly half (46%) of managers believe that AI-enhanced resumes could misrepresent skills, while 24% view it as giving an unfair advantage to those who use these tools. The concern is that such resumes might misalign with a candidate’s real abilities once they start the job.
Disclosure and Transparency: Many hiring managers are calling for transparency regarding the use of AI in job applications. Sixty-two percent of respondents said that companies should have policies requiring candidates to disclose whether their resumes were created using AI.
Why It Matters: The survey reveals a disconnect between the rise of AI-assisted tools and the values of many employers. While job applicants might turn to AI for efficiency, many hiring managers still prioritize a personal touch and authenticity. The survey shows that AI tools, when not carefully customized or disclosed, can hinder candidates’ chances.
As the debate over AI’s role in hiring continues, candidates in Georgia may need to rethink how they use these tools in their job search.
We should note that 44% isn’t a majority, so the flip side of this survey is that the majority of Georgia employers have no problem with AI generated resumes.
